USPTO serial 98809512
B.LABAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B.LABAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Garden Grove, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Selena Elansari
Selena Elansari Elansari A.P.C.16300 Sand Canyon Ave Ste 1011Irvine, CA 92618United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Agar-agar for food; Animal fats for food; Blended oil for food; Cacao butter for food; Canola oil for food; Coconut oil for food; Corn oil for food; Dairy-based chocolate food beverages; Dried milk for food; Fish-based snack food; Flaxseed oil for food; Fruit-based food bars; Fruit-based food snacks; Grapeseed oil for food; Lard for food; Linseed oil for food; Meat-based snack food; Nut oils for food; Nut-based food bars; Olive oils for food; Peanut oil for food; Pepper oil for food; Seaweed extracts for food; Sesame oil for food; Vegetable oils for food; Vegetable-based chocolate food beverages; Vegetable-based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Dessert mousse; Dessert puddings; Dessert puddings containing milk; Dessert puddings infused with alcohol; Dessert souffles; Food seasonings; Food starch; Annin tofu; Bakery desserts; Bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cakes, cookies, pastries, candies, and frozen confections for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; Bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cheesecakes for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; Candy for food; Cassava starch for food; Chocolate desserts; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Chocolate-based snack food; Confectionery in the form of dessert mousses; Dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of ice cream and other dairy-based desserts; Flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; Flour for food; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Frozen desserts consisting of flavored ice blocks with toppings; Frozen cashew-based desserts; Frozen soy-based desserts; Fructose for food; Grain-based food beverages; Grass-based food beverages; Herbal food beverages; Ice cream desserts; Instant dessert puddings; Malt extracts for food; Manioc starch for food; Potato starch for food; Rice-based pudding dessert; Rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); Turmeric for food; Yeast extracts for food; Yuca starch for food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |