USPTO serial 98810670
ALLY ROBOTIC CATARACT LASER SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 731Notice of Allowance
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARREDA, AMBER KYLEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
The USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance. To complete registration you generally need to file a Statement of Use or an extension request before the deadline.
Need help with ALLY ROBOTIC CATARACT LASER SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Notice of Allowance, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $947*
Plus Government fees of $450
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Orlando, FL, US
Orlando, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda Raoch
Amanda Raoch UB Greensfelder LLP200 W. Madison Street, 3300Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices for use in treating or diagnosing ophthalmic conditions with integrated recorded software for use and operation, sold as a unit; Surgical apparatus and instruments for use in ophthalmic surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Medical training and teaching | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Ophthalmic surgery services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lensar, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lensar, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ALLY ROBOTIC CATARACT LASER SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |