USPTO serial 98812240
BEAN ME UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAN ME UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Laurent (Québec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean F. Mellino
Sean F. Mellino McDonald Hopkins LLC600 Superior Avenue East, Suite 2100Cleveland, OH 44114United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Snack mix consisting primarily of processed peas and favas and also including processed nuts and beans; processed edible seeds, namely, processed poppy seeds, roasted pumpkin seeds, roasted spelt seeds, roasted sunflowers seeds, flavored sunflower seeds, toasted wheat seeds; processed nuts and seeds snack mixes; processed nuts, seeds and dried fruit mixes; seasoned nuts; dried fruit snack mixes; prepared seed-based snack mixes; flavored nuts; roasted nuts; salted nuts; nut-based snack foods; nut and seed-based snack bars; nuts and seeds mixes; nuts, seeds and dried fruit mixes; seasoned nuts; spiced mixed nuts; dried fruits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |