USPTO serial 98812373
ASTRALIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATKINS, JONATHAN RALPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASTRALIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi A. Schiller
23 Warren AvePlymouth, MA 02360United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting services, namely, business strategy consulting for enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) implementation | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Information technology training services, namely, training in the field of enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Customer, development, design, and maintenance of computer software for enterprise customer relationship management (CRM); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enterprise customer relationship management (CRM); Computer services, namely, integration of computer software for enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) into multiple systems and networks; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS), namely, development of custom applications and components on enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) platforms to address unique business requirements and extend enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) functionality; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS), namely, data migration from legacy software systems to enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) software platforms; Technology consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS), namely, for enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) implementation; Technology support services relating to migration and implementation of enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |