USPTO serial 98816235
SILUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sheridan, WY, US
Sheridan, WY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TREVOR A. CAUDLE, ESQ.
TREVOR A. CAUDLE, ESQ. TREVOR CAUDLE LAW PRACTICE, PC350 BAY STREET, #100-363SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sunglasses; Eye glass cases; Eye glasses; Optical lens blanks; Optical lenses; Optical inspection apparatus; Optical lenses made of allyl diglycol carbonate and polycarbonate; Sunglass chains and cords; Sunglass lenses; Sunglasses and spectacles; Cases for children's eye glasses; Cleaning discs for cleaning the lens of optical disc drives used in computers and digital video recorders; Cords for sunglasses or eye glasses; Electro-optical instruments for use in inspection and measurement of industrial components; Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses and ophthalmic frames and cases therefor; Floatable sunglasses; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Laser equipment designed for drilling optical lenses for eyeglasses; Lenses for sunglasses; Optical devices, namely, eye pieces for helmet mounted displays; Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), downloadable, for the diagnosis of balance disorders by recording, viewing, or analyzing eye movements; Spectacles and sunglasses; Straps for sunglasses or spectacles; Straps for sunglasses or eye glasses | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Eye charts for medical examination use; Eye testing apparatus; Light emitting devices, namely, lamps and LED devices for treatment of a variety of skin conditions; Manually-operated exercise equipment for physical therapy purposes; Medical imaging devices for eyes; Optometric instruments for locating the optical center of ophthalmic lenses; Personal protective equipment (PPE), namely, face shields for use in the medical and dental fields; Phototherapeutic apparatus for medical purposes, namely, a LED (light-emitting diode) light source for medical and aesthetic skin treatments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |