USPTO serial 98817003
CORTINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GERMICK JR., EDWARD JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORTINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARREN M. GELIEBTER
DARREN M. GELIEBTER LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP1325 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 28TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, poultry, not live; meat extracts for culinary purposes; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, or vegetables; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; oils and fats for food; milk, cheese, butter, yogurt and other milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk substitutes, namely, almond milk, coconut milk, peanut milk, rice milk, and soy milk; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; Processed mushrooms, namely, mushroom puree; Processed mushrooms, namely, preserved mushrooms; Dried edible mushrooms; Preserved artichokes; processed artichokes; Artichoke paste; olive oil for culinary purposes; cooking oil; sunflower oil for culinary purposes; soybean oil for cooking; vegetable oil for culinary purposes; edible oil; salad oil; frozen fruits; processed fruits, namely, frozen blueberries; pulses and nuts prepared for human consumption; seeds prepared for human consumption | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed quinoa; paella; rice; noodles; saffron for use as a food seasoning; sea salt for cooking; maple syrup ; curry pastes; curry sauce; curry; chili powders; chili seasoning; noodles and processed vegetables combined in unitary packages; couscous; dried chili peppers | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh mushrooms; raw mushrooms; unprocessed mushrooms; fresh artichokes; raw artichokes; unprocessed artichokes; unprocessed quinoa; unprocessed rice; raw asparagus; unprocessed asparagus; fresh asparagus; fresh lentils; fresh peppers; raw peppers; fresh chili peppers; unprocessed peppers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 18, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |