USPTO serial 98821278
ENOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Damon Ashcraft
J. Damon Ashcraft SNELL & WILMER, L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556UNITED STATES OF AMERICAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users featuring steel bars, sheets, coils, rods, poles, pipes, plates, non-electric wires, and tubing; distributorship services in the field of stainless steel bars, sheets, coils, rods, poles, pipes, plates, nonelectric wires, and tubing | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom steel rolling and fabrication to the order and specification of others; Custom manufacture of general product lines in the field of steel bars, sheets, coils, rods, poles, pipes, plates, non-electric wires, and tubing; precision metal manufacturing for others, namely, machining, turning, and grinding; Metalworking, namely, cutting, cut-to-length, slitting, sawing, priming, shot blasting, dimensioning, bevelling, water jet cutting, cutting-off, stamping, welding, laser welding, bending and plating of steel and metal steel bars, sheets, coils, rods, poles, pipes, plates, non-electric wires, and tubing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |