USPTO serial 98821300
FORM ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORM ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ, US
Scottsdale, AZ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Clark
Justin Clark J. Clark Law Firm, PLLC3100 West Ray Road, Suite 201Chandler, AZ 85226United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for language modeling; Providing online non-downloadable software for the artificial production of human speech and text; Providing online non-downloadable software for natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis; Providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning-based language and speech processing; Providing online non-downloadable software for creating and generating text; Providing online non-downloadable software for analyzing, filtering, categorizing, organizing, and summarizing information, content, and data; Providing online non-downloadable software for collecting, analyzing, and organizing data related to law enforcement interactions and generating text to complete reports on law enforcement interactions; Providing online non-downloadable software for collecting and summarizing data on law enforcement interactions for use in completing Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) compliant reports; Providing online non-downloadable software for collecting, organizing, and analyzing audio recording transcripts; Providing online non-downloadable software for collecting, organizing, and analyzing transcripts and metadata created from video surveillance systems; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for language modeling; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for the artificial production of human speech and text; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning-based language and speech processing; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for creating and generating text; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for analyzing, filtering, categorizing, organizing, and summarizing information, content, and data; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for collecting, analyzing, and organizing data related to law enforcement interactions and generating text to complete reports on law enforcement interactions; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for collecting and summarizing data on law enforcement interactions for use in completing Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) compliant reports; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for collecting, organizing, and analyzing audio recording transcripts; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for collecting, organizing, and analyzing transcripts and metadata created from video surveillance systems; Electronic data storage; Cloud storage services for electronic data; Data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect data; Intelligent natural language understanding services using cloud-based software technology | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |