USPTO serial 98824995
AERODOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FORREST, ELIZABETH P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with AERODOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Berkel en Rodenrijs, NL
Berkel en Rodenrijs, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Cerrati
Michael C. Cerrati Belzer PC2905 Bull StreetSavannah, GA 31405United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded computer software, downloadable and recorded computer software applications and downloadable and recorded mobile applications for document management and for collecting, compiling, systematizing, managing, updating, maintaining, analyzing, linking and making available data and information; Downloadable and recorded computer software for biometric systems for use in identification and authentication of individuals; Downloadable and recorded computer software for accessing databases and portals; Electronic databases in the field of aviation recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of electronic document and database management; Industrial technological analysis and industrial research services in the field of electronic document and database management; Industrial design; Quality control and authentication services in the field of aviation, namely, testing of products of others and inspection of products of others for quality control and authentication purposes; Certification services, namely, testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others to determine conformity with certification standards; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for analyzing and reviewing documents, passports, identification documents and aviation documents; Electronic document authentication services in the nature of authentication of documents in the field of aviation, passports, identification documents and aviation documents; Electronic storage of files and documents; Document reproduction in the nature of digitization of documents; Digitization of documents being scanning of documents for digitization; Electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the internet; Designing, creating, testing, programming, installing, updating, upgrading, implementing, integrating into multiple systems and networks and servicing in the nature of troubleshooting problems for computer software, software applications, web applications and mobile applications; Cloud computing, namely, providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for collecting, compiling, systematizing, managing, updating, maintaining, analyzing, linking and making available information and data; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for collecting, compiling, systematizing, managing, updating, maintaining, analyzing, linking and making available information and data; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for biometric systems for use in identification and authentication of individuals; Services of IT and ICT specialists, namely, maintenance of computer software and computer software systems; Data mining; Data conversion of electronic information and conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Electronic data storage; Database development services; Maintenance of on-line databases for others; Consultancy and information regarding the aforesaid services; The aforesaid services also provided via electronic networks, including the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |