Drawing for CLUTCH ENGINEERING

USPTO serial 98825994

CLUTCH ENGINEERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAGLIARDI, JEANINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLUTCH ENGINEERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina S. Loza

Christina S. Loza FAUVER, LARGE, ARCHBALD & SPRAY, LLP820 State Street, 4th FloorSanta Barbara, CA 93101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for vehicle diagnostics, vehicle trip logging, on board vehicle diagnostics scanning, vehicle maintenance records, and providing information about vehicle recalls for driversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 21, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 20, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance