USPTO serial 98828063
SHIELDPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLINT, DANIEL LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIELDPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kass
Jeffrey H. Kass Dickinson Wright PLLC1850 N. Central Ave.14th FloorPhoenix, AZ 85004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Key touch pads for use with home security alarm systems; Environmental monitoring system comprised of meters and sensors that measure pressure, humidity, temperature, smoke and CO and includes alarm and reporting functions; Window and door motion sensors for home security alarm systems; indoor and outdoor video cameras for home security alarm systems; battery and wireless door bells for home security alarm systems; electronic glass break detectors for home security alarm systems; downloadable computer software for managing home security systems; downloadable computer software for managing sensors in a home security system; downloadable computer application software for controlling and monitoring home security systems and personal security alarms; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for controlling and monitoring home security systems and personal security alarms | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2024 |
| 045 | Monitoring of home security systems and alarms for protecting personal property by a remote monitoring center for the dispatch of emergency public health and security services and notification to third parties | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |