Drawing for SO MUNCH MORE

USPTO serial 98831387

SO MUNCH MORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TATE-NAGHI, JACQUELINE P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SO MUNCH MORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gazal Pour-Moezzi

Gazal Pour-Moezzi Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP12275 El Camino Real, Suite 100San Diego, CA 92130United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Chicken nuggets, chicken strips, chicken wings, french fries, hash brownsACTIVE—
030Pancakes, french toast, burritos, tacos, fajitas, sandwiches, hamburger sandwiches, wrap sandwichesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 16, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 19, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 18, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance