Drawing for ROYAL BAMBOO

USPTO serial 98831652

ROYAL BAMBOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 643
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DERBY, KAREN SHEREE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL BAMBOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Xiaolan Lan

2788 San Tomas Expy.Santa Clara, CA, CA 95051United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bed sheet setsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2025ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 16, 2025PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 22, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 1, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 1, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Aug 1, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 1, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 1, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance