Drawing for DUAL TRUE VISION

USPTO serial 98834429

DUAL TRUE VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUAL TRUE VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Utsav Mukherjee

Utsav Mukherjee One Juris PC5233 Fresno AveRichmond, CA 94804United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacle frames made of metal or a combination of metal and plastics; Head-mounted video displays; Optical devices, namely, eye pieces for helmet mounted displays; Smart glasses; Video displays mounted in eyeglasses; Video monitorsACTIVEOct 20, 2024

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance