CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for VIDEOBANK

USPTO serial 98841263

VIDEOBANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEAN, JULES J.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEOBANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK E. TETREAULT

7 HUMMINGBIRD LANECRANSTON, RI 02921UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for storing, retrieving and manipulating sound and video and graphic images, and for displaying such images; Computer hardware for storing, retrieving and manipulating sound and video and graphic images, and for displaying such imagesACTIVEJan 1, 1997
042Computer hardware development of hardware to store, retrieve, archive and display data representing sound, graphic and video images; Software design and development of software to store, retrieve, archive and display data representing sound, graphic and video imagesACTIVEJan 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2026GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2026GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2026CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 22, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 21, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 21, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 21, 2026GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 21, 2026GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 21, 2026CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 14, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance