USPTO serial 98843844
PROMISE GLUTEN FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROMISE GLUTEN FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
County Donegal, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Weltsch
Keith A. Weltsch Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSuite 300Garden City, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bread; burger buns; bread rolls, namely, baps; rolls; brioches; fruit loaves in the nature of fruit bread; scones; pancakes; pastry; ready to use pastry; tarts; pies; stuffing mixes containing bread; fresh stuffing containing bread; bakery products; ready to bake dough products; bread doughs; cakes; biscuits; cookies; cereal based prepared snack foods; flour mixes for pancakes, cakes, bread and biscuits; sauces; sauce mixes, namely, preparations for making sauces; pizzas; ice-cream and ices; cereal based prepared meals; none of the foregoing containing gluten | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |