USPTO serial 98850949
PRESIDIO HUMAN AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICKS, AUDREY NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRESIDIO HUMAN AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nadya M. Sand
Nadya M. Sand Alston & Bird LLP1201 West Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software featuring generative artificial intelligence for use by software developers, information technology service providers, and cloud computing service providers to use in connection with the design, development, and maintenance of computer software and other software-related systems and solutions for collaboration, code generation, codebase management, requirements building, and management of the software development life cycle | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, development, and maintenance; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software featuring generative artificial intelligence for use by software developers, information technology service providers, and cloud computing service providers for the design, development, and maintenance of computer software and other software-related systems and solutions for collaboration, code generation, codebase management, requirements building, and management of the software development life cycle; development and implementation of software, hardware, and technology solutions for enterprise SaaS-application development for use by software developers, information technology service providers, and cloud computing service providers to improve and expedite the design, development, and maintenance of computer software and other software-related systems and solutions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |