Drawing for PODZ

USPTO serial 98855762

PODZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOPER, HUNTER JUDSON LOUIS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 134

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PODZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Trevor A. Caudle, Esq.

Trevor A. Caudle, Esq. Trevor Caudle Law Practice, PC350 Bay Street, #100-363San Francisco, CA 94133United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, tablets, and computers for sharing calendars, group texting, contact management, and sharing documentsACTIVEMar 4, 2024

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 13, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Nov 19, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2025MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 7, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance