USPTO serial 98860418
QUALITY CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRUZADO, SAMANTHA LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUALITY CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atlanta, GA, US
Atlanta, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARCY L. SPERRY, ESQ.
MARCY L. SPERRY, ESQ. SPERRY IP LAW LLC DBA VIVID IP3550 LENOX ROAD, 21ST FLOORATLANTA, GA 30326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Bourbon; Brandy; Champagne; Gin; Rum; Vodka; Whiskey; Wine; Alcoholic beverages containing fruit; Alcoholic beverages, except beer; Alcoholic carbonated beverages, except beer; Alcoholic coffee-based beverage; Alcoholic fruit beverages; Alcoholic malt beverages, except beers; Alcoholic mixed beverages except beers; Alcoholic tea-based beverage; Bourbon whisky; Brandy spirits; Liquor; Rose wines; Rum infused with vitamins; Rum punch; Rum-based beverages; Spirits; Spirits and liqueurs; Whiskey spirits; Wine coolers being drinks; Wine spritzers; Wine-based drinks; Alcoholic beverages, namely, flavor-infused whiskey; Black raspberry wine (Bokbunjaju); Blended spirits; Cherry brandy; Chinese brewed liquor (laojiou); Chinese white liquor (baiganr); Corn whiskey; Dessert wines; Distilled spirits; Distilled agave liquor; Distilled blue agave liquor; Flavored liquors; Flavored malt-based alcoholic beverages, excluding beers; Flavored tonic liquors; French brandy; Fruit wine; Grain-based distilled alcoholic beverages; Grape wine; Grape brandy distilled in the Cognac region of France in compliance with the laws and regulations of the French Government; Hard seltzer; Honey wine; Irish whiskey; Japanese shochu-based mixed liquor (mirin); Japanese white liquor (shochu); Mulled wine; Prepared wine cocktails; Red wine; Shochu (spirits); Sparkling fruit wine; Sparkling grape wine; Sparkling red wines; Sparkling white wines; Strawberry wine; Sugar cane juice rum; Sweet wines; Table wines; Tonic liquor containing herb extracts (homeishu); White wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |