USPTO serial 98860757
FRUITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GERMICK JR., EDWARD JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRUITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kennington R. Groff
Kennington R. Groff Bekiares Eliezer LLP2870 Peachtree Rd NE #512Atlanta, GA 30305United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for managing and verifying financial transactions; Downloadable computer software for connecting individuals with educators and mentors in the field of personal financial management services; Downloadable computer software platforms for education and learning in the field of personal financial management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to manage finances; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for managing personal finances; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for connecting individuals with educators and mentors in the field of personal financial management services; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for education and learning in the field of personal financial management services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |