Drawing for ST. CLOUD

USPTO serial 98861179

ST. CLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ST. CLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason Zedeck

Jason Zedeck Cypress LLP1925 Century Park East, Suite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90067United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Blush; Blusher; Blushers; Eyeliner; Eyeliners; Eyeshadows; Foundation; Foundations; Mascaras; Sunscreen; BB creams; CC creams; Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Concealers for skin, eyes, body and face; Eye lotions; Eye make-up; Eyebrow colors; Eyebrow cosmetics; Eyebrow gel; Eyebrow pencils; Eyebrow powder; Eyelash tint; Fingernail decals; Fingernail embellishments; Fingernail jewelry; Foundation creams; Highlighter make-up; Lip conditioners; Lip glosses; Lip liners; Lip stains; Lip stains for cosmetic purposes; Lipsticks; Nail art pens; Nail art stickers; Nail buffing preparations; Nail care preparations; Nail conditioners; Nail cosmetics; Nail cream; Nail gel; Nail glitter; Nail paint; Nail polish; Nail strengtheners; Nail varnish for cosmetic purposes; Sunscreen creams; Sunscreen lotions; Sunscreen preparations; Cosmetic nail preparations; Facial concealer; Facial moisturizers; Fragranced face care preparations, namely, facial cleansers and facial moisturizers; Fragranced skin care preparations, namely, skin cleansers and skin moisturizers; Lip tints; Liquid eyeliners; Lotions for strengthening the nails; Make-up foundation; Make-up foundations; Skin bronzer; Skin moisturizers used as cosmetics; Under-eye concealers; tinted skin moisturizersACTIVE—
021Cosmetic brushes; Make-up brush holders; Make-up brushes; Makeup trays; Applicator sticks for applying make-up; Applicator wands for applying make-up; Applicator wands for applying make-up to skin, eyes, lips and face; Applicators sold empty for applying cosmetic lotions for skin, eyes, body and face; Body scrubbing puffs; Eyelash brushes; Facial cleansing sponges; Facial sponges for applying make-up; Lip brushes; Makeup sponge holders; Nail brushes; Powder puffs; Sponges used for applying make-upACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Aug 19, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
May 19, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance