USPTO serial 98861614
HOVR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOVR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Warner-Blankenship
Matthew Warner-Blankenship Dentons Davis Brown PC215 10th St, #1300Des Moines, IA 50309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer application software for coordinating transport of people and cargo by motorized vehicles; downloadable computer software for engaging and coordinating transportation services, namely downloadable software for the automated scheduling and dispatch of motorized vehicles, downloadable software for connecting transportation providers with individuals and groups needing rides; downloadable mobile application software for coordinating transport of people and cargo by motorized vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, transmission of messages and data between transportation providers and riders; providing electronic message alerts via the internet and mobile networks notifying riders and drivers of ride requests, driver arrival, trip status updates, and safety notifications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for providing transportation services, bookings for transportation services and for dispatching motorized vehicles to customers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |