CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SCARLET

USPTO serial 98863204

SCARLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCARLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBYN S. LEDERMAN

ROBYN S. LEDERMAN BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.150 W. SECOND ST., SUITE 400NROYAL OAK, MI 48067-3846UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Fungicides; Herbicides; Insecticides; PesticidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 2, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 2, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 18, 2026RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jun 18, 2026RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2026RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jun 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 30, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 21, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance