USPTO serial 98863581
INNOWISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MTANOS, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with INNOWISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ST. PETERSBURG,, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daren Harris
Daren Harris Law On Call, LLC7533 Center View Ct., Ste. 210-LWest Jordan, UT 84084United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business analysis; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; Business consulting services in the field of optimization and digitization; Business management and organization consultancy; Business management consulting; Business management consulting and advisory services; Career placement; Employment recruiting services; Human resources management; Personnel placement; Professional business consulting; Consulting services in the fields of business management, human resources, and business organizational design | ACTIVE | Sep 23, 2008 |
| 042 | Computer programming services for creating augmented reality videos and games; Consultancy and information services relating to information technology architecture and infrastructure; Custom design of prototypes; Design and development of operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; Design and development of virtual reality software; Design of information graphics and data visualization materials; Developing of driver and operating system software; IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Planning, design and implementation of computer technologies for others; Product development and engineering services for others; Providing user authentication services using blockchain-based software technology for cryptocurrency transactions; Software design and development; Technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) software customization; Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity; Updating and maintaining cloud-based computer software through enhancements and patches; User interface (UI) design | ACTIVE | Sep 23, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |