USPTO serial 98864302
DOUBLUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUARNIERI, GRACE K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOUBLUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shanghai, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandy Lipkin
Sandy Lipkin Law Offices of Sandy LipkinP.O. Box 3518Ventura, CA 93006-3518United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Bracelets; Emerald; Gemstones; Pendants; Silver; Chaplets (rosaries); Children's jewelry; Choker necklaces; Costume jewelry; Diamond jewelry; Ear studs; Earrings; Gold jewelry; Gold, unworked or semi-worked; Imitation pearls; Jewelry armoires; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry made in whole or significant part of gold, silver, diamonds; Jewelry organizer cases; Necklace and earring combinations that can be worn separately or as one piece; Nose rings; Pearls; Pet jewelry; Women's jewelry | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |