USPTO serial 98867183
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pullman, WA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EVAN P EVERIST
EVAN P EVERIST DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP111 SOUTH MAIN STREETSUITE 2100SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2176| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded software for collecting, analyzing, measuring, and standardizing agricultural and horticultural cultivability, characteristics, and growth potential; Downloadable and recorded software for collecting, delivering, reporting, processing, transmitting, and analyzing data in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, horticulture, crops, cultivation, and fertigation; Downloadable and recorded software for controlling actuators and interpreting sensor data in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, horticulture, crops, cultivation, and fertigation; Downloadable and recorded software for analyzing and optimizing plant and crop characteristics and yields through analysis and management of water, nutrients, soil, light, temperature, and substrate in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, horticulture, crops, cultivation, and fertigation; Downloadable and recorded application programming interface (API) software for use in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, horticulture, crops, cultivation, and fertigation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for collecting, analyzing, measuring, and standardizing agricultural and horticultural cultivability, characteristics, and crop growth potential; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for collecting, delivering, reporting, processing, transmitting, and analyzing data in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, horticulture, crops, cultivation, and fertigation; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for controlling actuators and interpreting sensor data in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, horticulture, crops, cultivation, and fertigation; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable application programming (API) interface software for analyzing and optimizing plant and crop characteristics and yields through analysis and management of water, nutrients, soil, light, temperature, and substrate in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, horticulture, crops, cultivation, and fertigation; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable application programming (API) interface software for use in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, horticulture, crops, cultivation, and fertigation | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |