USPTO serial 98887624
B-WAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOREDO GASPAR, ALONSO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B-WAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chatsworth, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Calvin Chai
Calvin Chai ScienBiziP, P.C.550 South Hope Street, Suite 2825Los Angeles, CA 90071United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Beard trimmers; Blades and brushes for electric hair clippers and trimmers; Blades for electric razors; Blades for shavers; Electric hair curling irons; Electric hair cutters; Electric hair straightening irons; Electric razors; Electric razors and electric hair clippers; Electric shavers; Hair clippers; Hair trimmers; Non-electric razors; Non-electric shavers; Razor blades; Razors, electric or non-electric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |