USPTO serial 98892222
FLUIDCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALBANO, ASHLEY C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLUIDCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMIR V. ADIBI
AMIR V. ADIBI ADIBI IP GROUP, PC155 MONTGOMERY STREETSUITE 1010SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for cloud migration, data migration, log migration, and cloud computing platform scanning and analysis, namely, exporting and transferring customer data and log data between third-party cloud computing platforms; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud migration, data migration, log migration, and cloud computing platform scanning and analysis, namely, exporting and transferring customer data and log data between third-party cloud computing platforms; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for cloud migration, data migration, log migration, and cloud computing platform scanning and analysis, namely, exporting and transferring customer data and log data between third-party cloud computing platforms; all the foregoing excluding cloud data storage, cloud data hosting, and cloud computing platform services, and excluding software for connecting to the cloud to allow for collaboration among users across other software applications, excluding software for allowing real time updates to software applications accessible by multiple parties, and excluding software for enabling interconnectivity between other software applications and platforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |