USPTO serial 98898541
KONVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WANG, YUAN YUAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KONVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marek Krizka
Marek Krizka TRAMA LEGAL, PLLC1178 Broadway, Floor 3New York, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for analytics and revenue attribution of AI agents and marketing and for product recommendations, search, and product discovery; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analytics and revenue attribution of AI agents and marketing and for product recommendations, search, and product discovery; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for analytics and revenue attribution of AI agents and marketing and for product recommendations, search, and product discovery | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; Electronic data storage; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analytics and revenue attribution of AI agents, customer support, customer relationship management, customer service, customer engagement, helpdesk functionality, marketing, product recommendations, search, and product discovery; Providing search engines for the internet; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for analytics and revenue attribution of AI agents, customer support, customer relationship management, customer service, customer engagement, helpdesk functionality, marketing, product recommendations, search, and product discovery; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analytics and revenue attribution of AI agents, customer support, customer relationship management, customer service, customer engagement, helpdesk functionality, marketing, product recommendations, search, and product discovery; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analytics and revenue attribution of AI agents, customer support, customer relationship management, customer service, customer engagement, helpdesk functionality, marketing, product recommendations, search, and product discovery; User authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; User authentication services using technology for e-commerce transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |