USPTO serial 98899521
THINKDIFFUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINKDIFFUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred H. Perkins
Fred H. Perkins Morrison Cohen LLP909 Third Avenue, 27th FloorNew York, NY 10022United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) software, including in particular implementation, usage, development, deployment, adoption, and integration of AI technologies; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software that provides users with access to artificial intelligence (AI) tools, application programming interfaces (APIs) software for generating, processing, and modifying digital images, videos, and audio content using generative artificial intelligence models, tutorials, courses, and related consulting services; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for accessing and utilizing AI tools and APIs software for deploying, running, and managing generative artificial intelligence models and machine learning workflows through a self-service platform | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2023 |
| 045 | Online social networking services provided through a community platform for users to engage and collaborate on artificial intelligence (AI) topics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |