USPTO serial 98902680
SATXTREM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FORREST, ELIZABETH P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SATXTREM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony Celaya
Anthony Celaya Celaya Law1455 1st St., Ste. 216Napa, CA 94559United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Aquarium lights; Diving lights; Electric lights for festive decoration; Hand-held electric hair dryers; Hydroponic growing systems comprised of light emitting diode (LED) plant grow lights, grow cabinets in the nature of closed environments with integrated misting chambers, and automated controls therefor; Infrared lamps; Landscape lighting installations; Laser light projectors; LED underwater lights; Lights for use in growing plants; Pendant lighting fixtures; Solar light fixtures, namely, indoor and outdoor solar powered lighting units and fixtures; String lights for festive decoration; Swimming pool chlorinating apparatus; Wall water fountains | ACTIVE | Aug 19, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |