Drawing for BRIDGE WAR

USPTO serial 98912469

BRIDGE WAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIDGE WAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Emily Rohm Billig

Emily Rohm Billig Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC100 Light Street, 19th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable game software; downloadable interactive game software; downloadable multiplayer game software; downloadable game software for use on mobile devicesACTIVE—
041Providing online computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing online interactive computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing online multiplayer computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable multiplayer games; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer games for use on mobile devices; entertainment in the nature of computer game tournaments; providing entertainment information about computer game tournaments and competitions via a websiteACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring game software for playing games; providing online non-downloadable game software; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable game softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2026NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 25, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2025ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 30, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2025MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance