USPTO serial 98914469
AUTOGRAPH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WUDARSKY, MINDY CHEK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOGRAPH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigha R. Santoro
Leigha R. Santoro K & G Law LLC602 S. Bethlehem Pike, Bldg BAmbler, PA 19002United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable data solutions software designed specifically for the automotive industry, for streamlining data from multiple sources to deliver actionable insights and customizable dashboards; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for data collection, aggregation, evaluation and analysis giving businesses the tools they need to analyze performance and make data-driven decisions; software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for advanced data integration, analytics, and reporting solutions, enabling businesses to consolidate and analyze key performance metrics for informed decision-making; software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for advanced data integration, analytics, reporting solutions and AI-powered analysis enabling businesses to consolidate and analyze key performance metrics for informed decision-making | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |