USPTO serial 98919141
CONDOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MMEJE, OBIEZE GINIKANWA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CONDOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tara Reedy Sliva
Tara Reedy Sliva Dentons US LLPP.O. Box 1302Chicago, IL 60604United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Enclosures of metal for storage, sheltering and operation of railway signaling equipment; casing of metal; metal foundations for the support of railway gates; metal foundations for the support of railway signals | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Enclosures, namely, terminals, cabinets, shelves, and distribution boxes specially adapted for storing, sheltering and operation of railway signaling equipment; racks for the storage of electrical and mechanical railway equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Cold air blowers for clearance of snow and ice from railways and railway equipment and components for same; hot air blowers for clearance of snow and ice from railways and railway equipment and components for same | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction of enclosures, casings and equipment racks for railway equipment; maintenance and repair of enclosures, casings and equipment racks for railway equipment; consulting and advisory services in the field of construction, maintenance and repairing railway equipment and railway systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of enclosures, casings and equipment racks for railway equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design and development; design of enclosures, casings and equipment racks for railway equipment; inspection and testing of railway equipment; inspection and testing of enclosures, casings and equipment racks for railway equipment; design of railway systems; design of railway crossings; design of railway signaling systems; consulting and advisory services in the field of design, and testing of railway systems and the hardware and software for railway systems; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for receiving, processing, storing, analyzing and sharing data on trains, rail signals, rail switches, railway equipment, railway systems and for controlling the operation and movements of trains, rail switches, railway equipment and railway systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Safety inspection and safety consultation services for railway systems and railway crossings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Rail Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CONDOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |