USPTO serial 98921830
Serial No. 98921830
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALES,HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 98921830?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SONGPA-GU, SEOUL, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
Richard Y. Kim Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Exfoliant cosmetics; functional cosmetics being non-medicated skin care preparations; essential oils for personal use; cosmetic preparations for baths; body and beauty care cosmetics; shampoos; hand cleansers; toothpastes; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics; hand cream; exfoliant cleansers being non-medicated skin and facial cleansers; sun creams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |