Drawing for APOTHE

USPTO serial 98925014

APOTHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 762
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTIAN EDMUND
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 134

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APOTHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JIN J. KIM

JIN J. KIM ACI LAW GROUP, PC6 CENTERPOINTE DRSUITE 630LA PALMA, CA 90623

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, and toners; Skin toners; Facial emulsions; Ampoules sold filled with non-medicated serums for use on hair, skin, and lips for cosmetic purposes; Skin cream; Foam cleansers for personal use; Sun screen preparationsACTIVENov 6, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 31, 2026EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 26, 2026GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2026GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2026CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2025LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 23, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 13, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 13, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 11, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 11, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2025LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 27, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance