USPTO serial 98925571
MPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRENNER, BRANDI M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MALIK ABDUL-RAHMAN CONN
MALIK ABDUL-RAHMAN CONN NOVA BUSINESS LAW GROUP, LLP4151 Chain Bridge RoadFairfax, VA 20164United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Analysis of business data for federal agencies; Business management analysis for federal agencies; Business consultancy services for federal agencies; Business consulting services for federal agencies; Business management consultation for federal agencies; Business data analysis for federal agencies; Business project management services for federal agencies; Business organization consultancy for federal agencies; Business consultation for federal agencies; Business management consulting for federal agencies; Business analysis and business strategic planning services in the technology industry for federal agencies | ACTIVE | Sep 17, 2024 |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of IT project management for federal agencies; Information technology consulting relating to computer software design for federal agencies; Computer technology consultancy for federal agencies; Business technology software consultation services for federal agencies | ACTIVE | Sep 17, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |