USPTO serial 98928933
ZAGGLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERNS, LEE ANNE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZAGGLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeremy Peter Green Eche
Jeremy Peter Green Eche JPG Legal254 36th StreetSuite B541Brooklyn, NY 11232Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for calendar management, paying vendors and suppliers, distributing benefits to employees, tracking news and live events, electronic transfer of money, payment processing, providing incentive- and rewards-based loyalty programs, appointment scheduling, private messaging, sharing and accessing images, audio, video, text, live streams, and other media, data management and analysis, booking and ticketing, social and business networking, productivity tracking, marketing, advertising and product promotion management, workflow automation, managing affiliate programs, managing spending, file sharing and storage, and project collaboration; Downloadable computer software for calendar management, paying vendors and suppliers, distributing benefits to employees, tracking news and live events, electronic transfer of money, payment processing, providing incentive- and rewards-based loyalty programs, appointment scheduling, private messaging, sharing and accessing images, audio, video, text, live streams, and other media, data management and analysis, booking and ticketing, social and business networking, productivity tracking, marketing, advertising and product promotion management, workflow automation, managing affiliate programs, managing spending, file sharing and storage, and project collaboration; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for calendar management, paying vendors and suppliers, distributing benefits to employees, tracking news and live events, electronic transfer of money, payment processing, providing incentive- and rewards-based loyalty programs, appointment scheduling, private messaging, sharing and accessing images, audio, video, text, live streams, and other media, data management and analysis, booking and ticketing, social and business networking, productivity tracking, marketing, advertising and product promotion management, workflow automation, managing affiliate programs, managing spending, file sharing and storage, and project collaboration | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |