USPTO serial 98930884
GARDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THINGVOLD, CALDER J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GARDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Iliya Fridman
Iliya Fridman Fridman Law Group, PLLC169 BoweryGround floorNew York, NY 10002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Project management services for others for business purposes in the fields of architecture, interior design, urban planning design; Brand imagery consulting services; Business consulting, management, and planning services in the field of real estate development; Referrals for general building contractors; Branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for businesses and/or individuals; Business advisory services in the fields of architecture, interior design and urban planning design; Brand evaluation services; Brand positioning services; Business management consulting services in the field of real estate development; Brand concept and brand development services for corporate and individual clients | ACTIVE | Feb 24, 2000 |
| 042 | Advisory services for others in the field of building architecture; Architectural design; Architectural services; Interior design; Consulting in the fields of engineering and architecture; Advisory services for others in the field of interior design; Architectural and engineering services; Consulting services in the field of architectural design; Architectural consultancy services; Interior design services including space planning, furniture selection, material and surface selection; Graphic illustration and drawing services, namely, providing graphic illustrations and drawings of commercial and industrial building designs, and converting building designs or markups to electronic CAD drawings | ACTIVE | Feb 24, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |