USPTO serial 98933396
IMAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Proskey
Christopher A. Proskey BrownWinick Law Firm666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000Des Moines, IA 50309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Steel erection services in the commercial and industrial construction industries; Building construction and building renovation services; Construction and building services, namely, erection of structural steel buildings and structures; Construction project management services in the field of construction of steel commercial buildings; Construction of buildings and other steel structures; Construction of pre-engineered metal buildings; Construction project management services in the field of construction of steel structures; Construction services, namely, design build construction services in the field of design of structural steel erection. Construction project management services; Building construction supervision services for building projects; Consulting services in the field of steel construction; Consulting services in the field of steel erection; Crane, namely, heavy duty lifting and rigging services for construction purposes; Erector services, namely, structural steel erection in the field of construction; custom steel fabrication to the order and specification of others; General contracting services in the field of commercial building construction, namely preconstruction services, construction management, design-build services and structural steel erection.; General building contractor services in the field of construction and steel erection; General building contractor services; Installation of pre-engineered metal buildings and metal building additions; Steel stud frame installation services; Ornamental steel building erection and fabrication services for buildings; Planning and implementation project management of structural steel erection; Construction project management services in the field of building projects; Construction project management services in the field of prefabricated buildings; Construction project management services in the field of steel erection; Rebar installation services; Steel structure construction works; Steel erection services for commercial and industrial applications; Structural Steel construction works; Structural steel erection | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2023 |
| 042 | Building design services; Consulting services for others in the field of design of structural steel erection; Design and engineering services in the field of steel construction; Design of buildings; Desing of prefabricated buildings; Desing of structural steel buildings; Engineering and engineering support services, namely, design and development of erection plans and specifications in the construction field; Engineering services in the fields of steel, steel fabrication and steel erection; Structural engineering design services; Product development and engineering services for others | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |