USPTO serial 98934106
SYFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLIS, BRIAN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
One Holland Village, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle K. Muñoz
Danielle K. Muñoz Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP120 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 2100CHICAGO, IL 60603United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable mobile application software for searching, aggregating, and summarizing selected internet content in various languages to text through artificial intelligence technology; downloadable mobile application software for searching, aggregating, and summarizing information to text from internet content in various languages; online downloadable mobile application software allowing users to subscribe to internet content of interest in various languages to receive translated summarized updates in text in various languages | ACTIVE | May 28, 2025 |
| 042 | online non-downloadable computer software and online non-downloadable mobile application software for searching, aggregating, and summarizing selected internet content in various languages to text through artificial intelligence technology; provision of search, aggregation, summarization features of information to text from internet content in various languages; provision of online non-downloadable computer and mobile application software allowing users to subscribe to internet content of interest in various languages to receive translated summarized updates in text in various languages | ACTIVE | Dec 30, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |