USPTO serial 98941858
MULTIPLAYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PELLETIER II, GEORGE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIPLAYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1250New York, NY 10165United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultancy; Consultancy services regarding business strategies; Brand strategy services, namely, brand concept and brand development services for corporate and individual clients; Business consultancy services relating to product development; Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Business research; Market research; Market analysis and research services; Production of advertising films; Providing advice, consultancy and information relating to the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2025 |
| 042 | Industrial design; Design of industrial products; Visual design in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Graphic design in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Packaging design; Design of artwork in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Graphic art design in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Graphic illustration design in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Graphic logo design services in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Design of typefaces in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Animation design for others in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Development and design of digital sound and image carriers in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems, and industrial design; Product research in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Surveying services in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Product testing in relation to user interfaces, user experiences, motion design, design systems and industrial design; Providing advice, consultancy and information relating to the aforementioned services; None of the aforementioned relating to the design, development or testing of computer games | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |