USPTO serial 98942423
BIS CONSULTANTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRICKLAND, CODY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIS CONSULTANTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmers Branch, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darin Deaver
2801 Network BlvdSte 300Frisco, TX 75034Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Outsource service providers in the field of information technology relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware; Information technology consultancy relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware; Outsource service provider in the field of information technology consulting relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware; Installation, maintenance and repair of computer network and information technology equipment | ACTIVE | Apr 27, 2021 |
| 042 | Website design consultancy; Managing web sites for others; Information technology consultancy relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Outsource service provider in the field of information technology consulting relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Designing and creating web sites for others; Design and development of computer software; Design, development, and implementation of software for government websites and geographical data; Creating websites for others; Web site design consultancy; Data security consultancy; Designing internet sites for others; Internet security consultancy; Software design and development; Web site hosting services; Information technology consulting relating to computer software design; Design, development and implementation of software; Hosting of web sites; Design and development of computer software for government websites and geographical data; Design, development, installation and maintenance of computer software; Computer security consultancy; Website development for others; Web site design; Designing websites for others; Maintaining websites for others; Computer software consultancy; Consultancy with regard to webpage design | ACTIVE | Apr 27, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |