Drawing for AIDA

USPTO serial 98943311

AIDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANCA, ALBERTO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew G. Minder

Matthew G. Minder Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLPSuite 3600211 N BroadwaySt. Louis, MO 63102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in analyzing, summarizing and validating all data, documents and testimony in litigation, for preparing witness fact sheets, for preparing deposition outlines, for preparing event chronologies, for resolving factual relationships in data, documents and testimony, and exposing verifiable factual links from data, documents and testimony to evidence and exhibits, all for use in litigation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in analyzing, summarizing and validating all data, documents and testimony in litigation, for preparing witness fact sheets, for preparing deposition outlines, for preparing event chronologies, for resolving factual relationships in data, documents and testimony, and exposing verifiable factual links from data, documents and testimony to evidence and exhibits, all for use in litigationACTIVE—
045Litigation support services, namely, conducting electronic legal discovery in the nature of reviewing e-mails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance