USPTO serial 98947374
DIGITAL BRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITAL BRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathrynn M. Lyddane
Kathrynn M. Lyddane Dority & Manning, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | arranging and conducting trade shows in the fields of computer hardware and software, telephony, consumer electronics, information technology products and services, and business process services; arranging joint sales calls between resellers and vendor sales representatives; promoting collaboration and exchange of information among a network of resellers in the fields of computer hardware and software, telephony, consumer electronics, information technology products and services, and business process services; providing information about online ordering, online shipment tracking and billing, order processing and tracking, distribution to others, materials management, freight logistics, and component sourcing and procurement; sales promotion services and providing demand creation and lead generation activities and services; marketing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing access to an online network environment featuring technology that enables users being resellers to share data in the fields of business process services, computer hardware, software, and information technology products and services, telephony, and consumer electronics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical support services, namely, providing technical consultation and information, both being advice, in the fields of operation of computer hardware, software, and information technology products and services, telephony, and consumer electronics; providing a secured-access, members-only website featuring technology that enables users being resellers to communicate with each other | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |