USPTO serial 98947483
SKY CHEFS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NANNEY, KATHERINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKY CHEFS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irving, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
Kay Lyn Schwartz Foley & Lardner LLP2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600Dallas, TX 75201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Ready prepared and prepackaged meals and entrees consisting primarily of egg with one or more of meat, fish, poultry, vegetable, cheese or onion; prepared meals consisting primarily of cooked meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of rice or pasta; Prepared meals consisting primarily of cooked pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Airport catering and airport restaurant services; charter meal services being catering services; catering services; catering services for airlines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |