Drawing for MY HISTORY FACTORY

USPTO serial 98950397

MY HISTORY FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALL, MICHAEL E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY HISTORY FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. Emmett Weindruch

F. Emmett Weindruch Holland & Knight LLP1120 S Tryon Street, Suite 900Charlotte, NC 28203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an internet website portal featuring functionality for relationship management and communication with clients and prospective clients; marketing services rendered using artificial intelligence (AI)ACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for promoting the goods and services of others; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for providing historical and archival research, compiling data and documentation, and providing advertising and marketing consulting services, the foregoing being used to provide advertising and marketing services to others; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for providing marketing and promotional marketing services to others; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for customer relationship management and communicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance