USPTO serial 98951360
LUMAS POLYMERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMAS POLYMERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd L. Moore
Todd L. Moore Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C.3001 W. Big Beaver RoadSuite 624Troy, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals, namely, chemical additives for use in the manufacture of 3D printing compounds; Polymers and polymeric additives for use in the manufacture of 3D printing compounds; Polycondensation polymers for use in the manufacture of 3D printing compounds | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Non-construction materials, namely, synthetic rubber goods in the form of unworked, worked, and semi-worked filaments, pellets, resins, particles, powders, and derivatives thereof for additive manufacturing, 3D printing, and/or molding processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely material treatment services for monomers, polymers, polymeric additives, fillers, fibers, and derivatives thereof to form unworked, worked, and semi-work filaments, pellets, resins, particles, powders, or derivatives thereof used for additive manufacturing, 3D printing, and/or molding techniques and articles; material treatment consultation services; technical support services, namely, providing technical advice related to the treatment of materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |