USPTO serial 98951814
CERAMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JARAMILLO, JAVIER R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERAMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
Connie L. Ellerbach Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for artificial intelligence (AI) model pre-training, training, fine-tuning and serving; Downloadable software for managing AI inferencing and optimization processes; Downloadable enterprise software for building and deploying AI infrastructure; Downloadable software for developing, testing, and deploying machine learning models; Downloadable software for managing and deriving insights from enterprise and business data, namely, flagging issues in documents, extracting data from multiple documents, reconciling information across datasets and documents, and generating content with source-based permissions; Downloadable business enterprise software leveraging AI applications to enhance business processes and streamline workflows | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing AI-powered voice and text communication services for the electronic transmission of messages, data, and information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for artificial intelligence (AI) model pre-training, training, fine-tuning, and serving; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software tools for managing AI infrastructure and facilitating AI inferencing and optimization; Technical consulting services in the field of computer software and hardware development, namely, AI model development, deployment, and optimization; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for AI-driven business processes, document analysis, and data management, namely, flagging issues in documents, extracting data from multiple documents, reconciling information across datasets and documents, and generating content with source-based permissions; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring business enterprise software for leveraging AI applications to enhance business processes and streamline workflows | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal services featuring the use of artificial intelligence for compliance analysis; Legal support services featuring review of legal documents, the foregoing powered by artificial intelligence for identifying issues, extracting critical data, reconciling information, and ensuring adherence to source-specific permissions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |