USPTO serial 98956387
DELISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Michael Brioso
David Michael Brioso The Hearst Corporation300 West 57th StreetNew York, NY 10019United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Non-electric can openers; non-electric fruit peelers; non-electric vegetable peelers; hand-operated apple corers; cheese planes; non-electric pizza cutters; meat tenderizer, namely, a kitchen mallet; hand-operated mandolins for cutting food; flatware sets consisting of forks, knives and spoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Kitchen timers; meat thermometers; measuring cups; jiggers; double jiggers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household utensils, namely, turners; cooking spoons, kitchen ladles; whisks; kitchen tongs; ice cream scoops; garlic presses; cooking strainers; kitchen utensils, namely, splatter screens; food basters; mixing bowls; cutting boards; dinnerware; beverage glassware, drinking glasses, wine glasses, cocktail glasses, champagne glasses, corkscrews, fruit muddlers, double jiggers, cocktail strainers, decanters, cocktail shakers, bar serving trays, ice buckets, wine stoppers bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles drinkware; pastry brushes; rolling pins; hand-operated pastry blenders; cooling racks for baked goods; cake pans; cookie sheets; pans for baking; cake decorating sets sold as a unit comprised of tips, couplers, tube cleaning brushes, pastry bags and spatulas; scoops for serving or portioning cookie dough; dessert servers | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic cocktail mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named DELISH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |